From d3c7e9139c50bec5096925a09b9c1341942c72c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lennart Poettering Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:23:48 +0100 Subject: resolved: split out a new dns_type_may_redirect() call Let's abstract which RRs shall honour CNAMEs, and which ones should not. --- src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c') diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c index f50d780ebb..31154fbc77 100644 --- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c +++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-cache.c @@ -672,11 +672,7 @@ static DnsCacheItem *dns_cache_get_by_key_follow_cname_dname_nsec(DnsCache *c, D if (i && i->type == DNS_CACHE_NXDOMAIN) return i; - /* The following record types should never be redirected. See - * . */ - if (!IN_SET(k->type, DNS_TYPE_CNAME, DNS_TYPE_DNAME, - DNS_TYPE_NSEC3, DNS_TYPE_NSEC, DNS_TYPE_RRSIG, - DNS_TYPE_NXT, DNS_TYPE_SIG, DNS_TYPE_KEY)) { + if (dns_type_may_redirect(k->type)) { /* Check if we have a CNAME record instead */ i = hashmap_get(c->by_key, &DNS_RESOURCE_KEY_CONST(k->class, DNS_TYPE_CNAME, n)); if (i) -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf