summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/extlib/README
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEvan Prodromou <evan@status.net>2009-10-31 13:35:20 -0400
committerEvan Prodromou <evan@status.net>2009-10-31 13:35:20 -0400
commitae7d524fd89943a3b0f94169f486c68a5da833e6 (patch)
tree69e918b5c34106176cf3a76a76e242400425ed3b /extlib/README
parent08546e4fb403b55827e32b6d59369b371d2334ac (diff)
add a README warning devs from fracking around in extlib/
Diffstat (limited to 'extlib/README')
-rw-r--r--extlib/README58
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/extlib/README b/extlib/README
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cfc2f9c8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/extlib/README
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+DO NOT "FIX" CODE IN THIS DIRECTORY.
+
+ONLY UPSTREAM VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE GO IN THIS DIRECTORY.
+
+This directory is provided as a courtesy to our users who might be
+unable or unwilling to find and install libraries we depend on.
+
+If we "fix" software in this directory, we hamstring users who do the
+right thing and keep a single version of upstream libraries in a
+system-wide library. We introduce subtle and maddening bugs where
+our code is "accidentally" using the "wrong" library version. We may
+unwittingly interfere with other software that depends on the
+canonical release versions of those same libraries!
+
+Forking upstream software for trivial reasons makes us bad citizens in
+the Open Source community and adds unnecessary heartache for our
+users. Don't make us "that" project.
+
+FAQ:
+
+Q: What should we do when we find a bug in upstream software?
+
+A: First and foremost, REPORT THE BUG, and if possible send in a patch.
+
+ Watch for a release of the upstream software and integrate with it
+ when it's released.
+
+ In the meantime, work around the bug, if at all possible. Usually,
+ it's quite possible, if slightly harder or less efficient.
+
+Q: What if the bug can't be worked around?
+
+A: If the upstream developers have accepted a bug patch, it's
+ undesirable but acceptable to apply that patch to the library in
+ the extlib dir. Ideally, use a release version for upstream or a
+ version control system snapshot.
+
+ Note that this is a last resort.
+
+Q: What if upstream is unresponsive or won't accept a patch?
+
+A: Try again.
+
+Q: I tried again, and upstream is still unresponsive and nobody's
+ checked on my patch. Now what?
+
+A: If the upstream project is moribund and there's a way to adopt it,
+ propose having the StatusNet dev team adopt the project. Or, adopt
+ it yourself.
+
+Q: What if there's no upstream authority and it can't be adopted?
+
+A: Then we fork it. Make a new name and a new version. Include it in
+ lib/ instead of extlib/, and use the StatusNet_* prefix to change
+ the namespace to avoid collisions.
+
+ This is a last resort; consult with the rest of the dev group
+ before taking this radical step.