| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Rather than go to the database for every single package on something like a
files update, use the one we already have. Duh.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Apparently Django 1.1.1 let null fields pass right through but this now
causes reporead to blow up in 1.1.2. Fix the issue and get things working
again by allowing nulls where it probably makes sense and including a
migration to fix the issue, which for the real database will be a no-op.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We had a situation where the last 'any' architecture package was present in
the [testing] repo and never got removed because we never did the
db_update() call on that architecture. Instead of looping all possible
architectures and only calling if len() > 0, always call db_update() for
both the primary architecture and the 'any' architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
And also add a data migration to add the value retroactively for anything
already in our database. We simply fall back to pkgname if pkgbase isn't
available.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This will allow files to be imported for all existing packages in the
database while not worrying about the files database being a touch out of
date. It utilizes the new files_last_update column to perform the insertion
and updating of file lists intelligently.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This depends on some changes I made to our script that generates the file
list databases, but it allows us to treat the files databases in an almost
identical manner to a regular database. The only difference is the fact that
it contains 'files' entries.
One catch that will be addressed in a separate patch: if the files DB lags
behind the regular DB, running an update from it could cause packages in the
web interface to be downgraded. A 'no-add/remove' option could be helpful
for this case.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Otherwise a --force will clear out all our flagged packages. :/ Whoops.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Just ignore it if it is completely screwed up.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
I can't believe we still have some of these around, but they are relatively
straightforward to handle.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This allows re-running repoadd on all packages in case of adding data or
fixing a bug without rendering the last_update values in the database
useless. For packages that aren't geting their version bumped, don't touch
last_update on a force import but do touch the rest of the fields.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We can capture the build date, compressed size, and installed size when
reporead runs. Even if we don't show all of it, we should pull it in.
FS#14270 is requesting that the package size be shown on the website.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Since these timestamps will differ across repos and arches anyway (for a
total of 10 distinct timestamps currently per hour), it isn't really
necessary to only use one timestamp. Allow each package to get a unique
creation time.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Check the arch, check the filename for existence, etc.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Rather than struggle with getting the environment set up, let's make this a
custom Django admin command and use the flexibility that gives us. This is
the initial rough cut of making it happen; further commits should clean up
some of the rough edges.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
