| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This allows us to store conflicts, provisions (provides), and replacements
in the database, things we weren't capturing before. All can be multivalued,
just like License and PackageGroup.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This allows us to store multiple licenses per package in a more elegant
fashion, and will later allow us to search and filter on this information.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
They show up but aren't hotlinked to anything...just yet.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We had some dependency issues between migrations that needed to be
explicitly defined in order to get things fully moving, and do to some
braindeadness in Django tests not including the project url config, we need
to do some clever business when using the url tag in the base template so
tests don't doe with a NoReverseMatch exception.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This is an attempt to fix our long-standing problems dealing with maintainer
information. Move the actual maintainer information off of the package model
into a PackageRelation object, which has some flexibility to later represent
more than just maintainership.
This solves multiple problems:
* If a package gets accidentally deleted, so did the maintainer info
* Testing packages have always shown up as orphans
* With split packages, it was easy to miss some of the sub-packages
This commit does not include the deletion of the original maintainer column;
that will come at a later time when I feel more confident that the data was
migrated correctly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
