| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add a new 'SignoffSpecification' model which will capture metadata
regarding a specific package if it differs from the norm- e.g. more or
less than 2 required signoffs, is known to be bad, a comment from the
maintainer, etc. The groundwork is laid here; much of this will still
need to be wired up in the future.
Enhance the view with a lot more JS prettiness and add revoking of
signoffs. The signoff page can be filtered and the links and all the fun
stuff are totally dynamic now.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This one is centered around pkgbase, much as our PackageRelation object
is. However, it also tracks all of the versioning fields we have in
order to making joining against the current package testing list
possible. Finally, additional metadata including a created date, an
(optional) revoke date, and a comments field are added.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This allows us to store conflicts, provisions (provides), and replacements
in the database, things we weren't capturing before. All can be multivalued,
just like License and PackageGroup.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This allows us to store multiple licenses per package in a more elegant
fashion, and will later allow us to search and filter on this information.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
They show up but aren't hotlinked to anything...just yet.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
We had some dependency issues between migrations that needed to be
explicitly defined in order to get things fully moving, and do to some
braindeadness in Django tests not including the project url config, we need
to do some clever business when using the url tag in the base template so
tests don't doe with a NoReverseMatch exception.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This is an attempt to fix our long-standing problems dealing with maintainer
information. Move the actual maintainer information off of the package model
into a PackageRelation object, which has some flexibility to later represent
more than just maintainership.
This solves multiple problems:
* If a package gets accidentally deleted, so did the maintainer info
* Testing packages have always shown up as orphans
* With split packages, it was easy to miss some of the sub-packages
This commit does not include the deletion of the original maintainer column;
that will come at a later time when I feel more confident that the data was
migrated correctly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
