| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This moves signoff creation and display to the new packages.Signoff
model.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This one is centered around pkgbase, much as our PackageRelation object
is. However, it also tracks all of the versioning fields we have in
order to making joining against the current package testing list
possible. Finally, additional metadata including a created date, an
(optional) revoke date, and a comments field are added.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
This allows us to store conflicts, provisions (provides), and replacements
in the database, things we weren't capturing before. All can be multivalued,
just like License and PackageGroup.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
For now it is read only. Display a few tables of various ways of
detecting stale package relations. These include inactive users, pkgbase
values that no longer exist, and users that are listed as maintainers
that don't have the proper permissions for that package anymore.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
These users are being marked inactive because they are no longer
developers; thus they should have all of their maintainer relations
removed from the database. This is one of two causes of "orphan" package
relation objects, the other being pkgbase values that go out of
existence.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This allows us to store multiple licenses per package in a more elegant
fashion, and will later allow us to search and filter on this information.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Main change is just to move groups from the default packagegroup_set
location to a related_name of groups. Also refer to the Package class
directly rather than by text string if we have it available.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
They show up but aren't hotlinked to anything...just yet.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
This is an attempt to fix our long-standing problems dealing with maintainer
information. Move the actual maintainer information off of the package model
into a PackageRelation object, which has some flexibility to later represent
more than just maintainership.
This solves multiple problems:
* If a package gets accidentally deleted, so did the maintainer info
* Testing packages have always shown up as orphans
* With split packages, it was easy to miss some of the sub-packages
This commit does not include the deletion of the original maintainer column;
that will come at a later time when I feel more confident that the data was
migrated correctly.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
|
|
Also added vim command comment to the end of files.
|
|
|
|
Special Note
Prior to git import, approx 90% of the code was done by Judd Vinet. Thanks Judd!
|
