arch-systemd: fix multi-paragraph footnote for pandoc

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions

diff --git a/public/arch-systemd.md b/public/arch-systemd.md
index e62a61b..a3bc06f 100644
--- a/public/arch-systemd.md
+++ b/public/arch-systemd.md
@@ -34,27 +34,27 @@ there is compatibility for the variables that used to be there, but
 that is going away.
 
 [^1]:
-   *I* don't think it's bloated, but that is the criticism.
-   Basically, I discount any argument that uses "bloated" without
-   backing it up.  I was trying to say that it takes a lot of heat
-   for being bloated, and that there is be some truth to that (the
-   systemd-fsck and syslog comments), but that these claims are
-   largely unsubstantiated, and more along the lines of "I would have
-   done it differently".  Maybe your ideas are better, but you
-   haven't written the code.
+    *I* don't think it's bloated, but that is the criticism.
+    Basically, I discount any argument that uses "bloated" without
+    backing it up.  I was trying to say that it takes a lot of heat
+    for being bloated, and that there is be some truth to that (the
+    systemd-fsck and syslog comments), but that these claims are
+    largely unsubstantiated, and more along the lines of "I would have
+    done it differently".  Maybe your ideas are better, but you
+    haven't written the code.
+    
+    I personally don't have an opinion either way about SysV-init vs
+    systemd. I recently migrated my boxes to systemd, but that was
+    because the SysV init scripts for NFSv4 in Arch are problematic. I
+    suppose this is another **advantage** I missed: *people generally
+    consider systemd "units" to be more robust and easier to write
+    than SysV "scripts".*
    
-   I personally don't have an opinion either way about SysV-init vs
-   systemd. I recently migrated my boxes to systemd, but that was
-   because the SysV init scripts for NFSv4 in Arch are problematic. I
-   suppose this is another **advantage** I missed: *people generally
-   consider systemd "units" to be more robust and easier to write
-   than SysV "scripts".*
-   
-   I'm actually not a fan of either. If I had more time on my hands,
-   I'd be running a `make`-based init system based on a research
-   project IBM did a while ago. So I consider myself fairly
-   objective.
+    I'm actually not a fan of either. If I had more time on my hands,
+    I'd be running a `make`-based init system based on a research
+    project IBM did a while ago. So I consider myself fairly
+    objective.
 
 [^2]:
-   You can still have `USEDMRAID`, `USELVM`, `interface`, `address`,
-   `netmask`, and `gateway`. But those are minor.
+    You can still have `USEDMRAID`, `USELVM`, `interface`, `address`,
+    `netmask`, and `gateway`. But those are minor.