diff options
| author | Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> | 2016-02-28 07:12:18 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@sbcglobal.net> | 2016-02-28 07:12:18 -0500 |
| commit | 7115b71c353c004dbfe70a0d96012a2213e77405 (patch) | |
| tree | 6c693dcc564023479560f10aeaea5ed0219dd652 /public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | |
| parent | 9ea8568d0c333916833bee1eaf021334090486fd (diff) | |
whitespace cleanup
Diffstat (limited to 'public/fs-licensing-explanation.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md index a8ef5ac..9bed879 100644 --- a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md +++ b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ This is based on a post on [reddit][1], published on 2013-02-21. > Foundation Inc". How can software be both licensed under GNU and > copyrighted to a single group? It was my understanding that once > code became free it didn't belong to any particular group or -> individual. +> individual. > > [LiveCode is GPLv3, but also sells non-free licenses] Can you really > have the same code under two conflicting licenses? Once licensed |