| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Previously, after checking the local zone for a reply and finding one we'd not
initialize the answer ifindex from that. Let's fix that.
|
|
This should be handled fine now by .dir-locals.el, so need to carry that
stuff in every file.
|
|
This adds initial support for validating RRSIG/DNSKEY/DS chains when
doing lookups. Proof-of-non-existance, or proof-of-unsigned-zones is not
implemented yet.
With this change DnsTransaction objects will generate additional
DnsTransaction objects when looking for DNSKEY or DS RRs to validate an
RRSIG on a response. DnsTransaction objects are thus created for three
reasons now:
1) Because a user asked for something to be resolved, i.e. requested by
a DnsQuery/DnsQueryCandidate object.
2) As result of LLMNR RR probing, requested by a DnsZoneItem.
3) Because another DnsTransaction requires the requested RRs for
validation of its own response.
DnsTransactions are shared between all these users, and are GC
automatically as soon as all of these users don't need a specific
transaction anymore.
To unify the handling of these three reasons for existance for a
DnsTransaction, a new common naming is introduced: each DnsTransaction
now tracks its "owners" via a Set* object named "notify_xyz", containing
all owners to notify on completion.
A new DnsTransaction state is introduced called "VALIDATING" that is
entered after a response has been receieved which needs to be validated,
as long as we are still waiting for the DNSKEY/DS RRs from other
DnsTransactions.
This patch will request the DNSKEY/DS RRs bottom-up, and then validate
them top-down.
Caching of RRs is now only done after verification, so that the cache is
not poisoned with known invalid data.
The "DnsAnswer" object gained a substantial number of new calls, since
we need to add/remove RRs to it dynamically now.
|
|
tree-wide: sort includes in *.h
|
|
This is a continuation of the previous include sort patch, which
only sorted for .c files.
|
|
Instead of taking a DnsQuestion object (i.e. an array of keys) only take
a single key. This simplifies things a bit, and as DNS/LLMNR require a
single question per query message was unnecessary anyway.
This mimics a similar change that was done a while ago for the dns cache
logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
negative caching
|
|
Name defending is still missing.
|
