diff options
author | Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> | 2008-11-03 00:10:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> | 2008-11-03 00:10:20 +0100 |
commit | aef35cac61774c147e1324220b8647f2af74b13b (patch) | |
tree | 4b8153067f73ec1d84461ea14f8b32c1322afc9d /TODO | |
parent | b88f4c5007ed5968ecd7dbf7e27a633e32c657ed (diff) |
decoupling of flow control and interactive UI code from interactive installer + some fixes and todo updates
Diffstat (limited to 'TODO')
-rw-r--r-- | TODO | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -* base procedure wordt implementatie van alles wat auto gaat uit setup script, -other steps warning 'not implemented' -* in automatic-dieter: health check using svn info /<hostname> +* base procedure wordt implementatie van alles wat auto gaat uit setup script, other steps warning 'not implemented' +* port all flow control from /arch/setup into the interactive procedure * in elke phase een lege worker die te overriden valt zoda we geen phases moeten overriden * process and fix libraries @@ -12,7 +11,10 @@ other steps warning 'not implemented' procedure wants to do something interactive. interactive functions maybe dont belong in a procedure? -> depend_procedure good enough? or do we need more fine-grained dependencies (take function foo from procedure bar - from module baz). for now let's try like this.. + from module baz). for now let's try like this.. -> we can call explicit + functions from libraries from modules.. so then just stick it in a lib -> + lots of stuff can go into lib-ui, making the procedure itself just the + 'execution plan'.. sounds good actually. * base procedure idea: it should just tell you what to do? -> less implementation work in base procedure, more in other procedures... * fix crossconcerns: procedures are about _how_ (autodetection, asking user,...) |