diff options
author | Luke Shumaker <LukeShu@sbcglobal.net> | 2013-10-13 16:26:12 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Luke Shumaker <LukeShu@sbcglobal.net> | 2013-10-13 16:26:12 -0400 |
commit | 8303f7626e61d6aeadc5ccf04bda12474acb6cd5 (patch) | |
tree | 2703760be847bb3510f3ffbeea4dbdb0a9e2fb2f /public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | |
parent | 302323180f66e688b814c47197dc7adac99de679 (diff) |
spell check
Diffstat (limited to 'public/fs-licensing-explanation.md')
-rw-r--r-- | public/fs-licensing-explanation.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md index df4f24d..3e30975 100644 --- a/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md +++ b/public/fs-licensing-explanation.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ This is based on a post on [reddit][1], published on 2013-02-21. > individual. > > [LiveCode is GPLv3, but also sells non-free licenses] Can you really -> have the same code under two conflicting licences? Once licensed +> have the same code under two conflicting licenses? Once licensed > under GPL3 wouldn't they too be required to adhere to its rules? I believe that GNU/the FSF has an FAQ that addresses this, but I can't |